Two histories that should connect

Source of wealth describes how a person accumulated their overall assets. Source of funds concerns the provenance of the specific money or assets involved in a transaction. FATF guidance makes this distinction in the context of politically exposed persons; the concepts also help organise the evidence banks and other regulated providers may request under their applicable procedures.

A transfer from a reputable bank does not by itself explain how the money was earned. The receiving institution may need the event behind it, such as business profits, a company sale, employment, inheritance or an investment disposal. The appropriate evidence depends on the transaction and risk assessment.

References [1]

How the analysis fits together

These questions cover different parts of the financial story. Wealth concerns how a person built their overall financial position; funds concern the origin of money used for a particular transaction or account. A bank statement showing today’s balance can be useful, but it may not explain the business sale, earnings, inheritance or investment gains that produced that balance.

Construct a chronological evidence trail. For a business sale, that might connect ownership, the sale agreement, settlement statements, receipt of proceeds and any subsequent transfers. For accumulated earnings, it might reconcile employment or business income with tax and bank records. The appropriate evidence depends on the facts and the institution’s risk assessment; there is no universal document that ends every inquiry.

References [1][2]

Assessment sequence

This is a review framework. The applicable domestic provisions and any relevant treaty determine the result in a particular case.

StepWhat to establish
Identify the questionClarify whether the institution needs overall wealth history, transaction-specific origin, or both.
Build the chronologyList material events that created wealth and the path of the funds now being used.
Reconcile valuesExplain differences caused by tax, reinvestment, exchange rates, loans or transfers between owned accounts.
Address unusual stepsExplain gifts, trusts, crypto transfers, private loans or third-party payments accurately and provide relevant records.
Protect and updateUse the agreed secure channel and retain a consistent explanation for subsequent institutional reviews.

Build the story from material events

Start with a timeline of the main wealth-creating events and connect each to reliable records. For a business sale, that could include ownership history, the sale agreement, completion statement, relevant tax treatment and receipt of proceeds. For accumulated business income, accounts, distributions and bank records may be more useful than a single current balance.

An inheritance, family gift or loan introduces another party and legal basis. Explain the relationship, agreement or estate process and the relevant payment trail. A narrative should acknowledge uncertainties or missing records rather than turning an estimate into a claimed documented fact.

References [2]

Keep complex asset histories readable

For crypto or frequent trading, preserve acquisition records, exchange statements, wallet ownership evidence where relevant, disposals and the route into the banking system. A spreadsheet summarising the flow should be traceable to source records. Do not assume that a tax return alone proves every link in a long transaction chain.

Reconcile names, entities, currencies and dates across the documents. Explain material differences such as a company’s gross sale price versus the individual’s net proceeds. Certified translations or legalisation may be required for some applications; obtain the recipient’s actual requirements before ordering them.

References [3]

Protect the information while making it usable

Store sensitive records securely and share them through the provider’s approved channel. Confirm who is requesting them, why they are needed and whether a particular excerpt or full document is required. Avoid sending an entire unorganised archive when a well-indexed file would answer the question more clearly.

We can help prepare a coherent onboarding and implementation file, identify evidence gaps and coordinate requests. Good preparation makes the lawful origin and movement of assets easier to assess; it does not replace an institution’s independent review or justify inaccurate declarations.

Common misunderstandings

  • A large account balance explains where money is held, not necessarily how it was earned.
  • Source of wealth and source of funds can require different evidence.
  • Unsupported descriptions or omissions can create more questions than a clear explanation of a complex history.

Document checklist

Track your preparation in this browser. Final requirements depend on the route and filing authority.

0 prepared
Sources & research notes3 references